Karnataka Elections 2013: 4 Parties and 4 Stories

Four Parties, Four Stories

By Harish Bijoor

As Karnataka wakes up to another summer of election discontent, the noise level in our lives is slated to go up by decibels in the weeks ahead of 5 May.  This noise is not just aural noise, but instead it is all about the clutter of the visual, the confused tonality of touch, the sense of mixed election smell and indeed the delicious taste of an election as well. Not to talk of the after-taste. Bitter or otherwise!

Elections, after all, are very sensorial processes. Sensorial processes that affect our sense of sight, the sense of smell, the sense of touch, the sense of sound, the sense of taste and indeed the sixth sense beyond that as well. The election ahead in the state of Karnataka is therefore an interesting one.

At this point of time, parties are yet to announce their candidates and their party manifestoes are still being cobbled and bound together. To that extent, the election ground of Karnataka is as pure as pure can be as of now. I am really talking about the mindsets of people and their dispositions to parties. The minds of people are yet to be influenced by the campaign that is just about to commence once the last date for withdrawal of nominations is upon us. To that extent, this is a lovely time to assess what each party has in store for itself in terms of imagery. Imagery cues that each party has accrued over the last five years, and in the case of one party, imagery cues that have accrued over the last three months.

I am going to paint a picture from the Brand Positioning perspective of the top four formations, in alphabetical order.

And before I do just that, a definition for a start. The Brand Position of a political party is really the exact pinpointed position a political party occupies in a voter’s mind at a given point of time, in relation to all other political parties that occupy that voters mind. To that extent, this brand position exploration is an as-is-as-of-now kind of an exploration. Do also remember that this position can change with time, change with campaigns, change with crises, and change with an act of God as well. The joy of political reality is change. Constant change that continues right up to the date of polling. And that’s why, none of us can call an election right. Never ever!

Let’s explore the brand positions and high ground occupied by the various parties in Karnataka as of now. Lets remember, every political party is a brand and its leaders are sub-brands that go to either embellish or rob the party of its deserving image. So here goes a quick paintbrush imagery of the four prominent formations that are assembled to face the electorate.

1.     BJP:
The Story So Far: A party in tumult. But then which party is not? The ‘nataka’ of Karnataka politics has bitten every one of them.  The BJP however has many bites to show though. A clear mandate to rule 5 years ago. A leader who rose from the grass roots in the guise of BS Yediyurappa. A good start. The politics of appeasement of groups. Rebellion. The Bellary brothers. Scams galore. Corruption issues that had the leader go to jail as well. And many Ministers as well. The challenger and the challenged all went to jail for sure. Forsaking the CM’s gaddi to a trusted name. The trusted name assumes his own in no time. A demand to change leadership. Resort politics. Brinksmanship. A new leader. But the same old issue. The leader assumes his own, this time causing for division within the Lingayat vote-bank itself. Brinksmanship again. And the leader who built the BJP in Karnataka, BSY, finally leaves the party to form his own. A quick variant of a name: The KJP. From “Bharatiya” to “Karnataka” Janata Party.

The Brand Imagery of the BJP: Corruption is a non-issue. Performance is. Voters strangely forgive corruption, but not a lack of performance. The BJP seen as a party that squandered the popular and solid mandate given to it, is an unforgiveable image the party has to tide over. This is the key explanation the communication format of the party needs to address in Karnataka.

2.     Congress:
The Story So Far: A party broken in form. While the party ruled the roost in the UPA coalition at the Centre, Karnataka remained a muddled dream of fishing in troubled waters. The efforts kept moving in a straight-line trajectory as any opposition party worth its salt would indulge in. The efforts, despite so many opportunities provided by the ruling party in the state, came close to snatch it all away from the BJP, but the party could never manage it really. A divided leadership in the State ensured that the party’s biggest competition was in-between its own leaders. This continued. Sadly, this continues to date, with the latest bickerings on ticket allocation catalyzing it all even more. Who is the real leader of the Congress party in the State then?  And “real” means real and unchallenged. Unchallenged in front of the leader, and more importantly unchallenged when the leader has turned his back to smoke a cigarette.

The Brand Imagery of the Congress: The party is fighting with itself. The party has a near sure shot chance at governance. The party has however not got its act together. The party is seen to be secular. The party leaders seem to exhibit ability, but the missing element is a common weal and a common driver who all will respect, before, during and more importantly after the elections. This is the key communication the party needs to address. Manifesto apart, leadership needs to be defined.  Announce Siddaramiah as the CM in waiting and sort it all out then? Or will it? Or will an old war-horse of the party in Karnataka need be invited back?

3.     JDS:
The Story So Far: A party that is intermittently awake and intermittently asleep. Are there two parties really, or one? Is there a party in North Karnataka and one in the Bangalore-Mysore region? Kumaranna’s work has been appreciated in the past at the ground level. But has Kumaranna lost out being center-stage for long? Public memory is proverbially short. The party’s stand on the Cauvery and Krishna waters issue has been a point of appreciation in the farmer community. That’s a plus. Is the JDS a party that is family led and family managed? And has this put off a lot of leaders who have deserted it over the last 5 years?

The Brand Imagery of the JDS: Confused as of now. The party needs to address key issues in the eye and has to move much beyond its trajectory of talking about the farmer at large. Rapid urbanization is a reality and the party needs to address these issues that relate to infrastructure, education and more, rather clearly and with cogent purpose. And just water politics may not do.

4.     The KJP:

The Story So Far: A new born led by an old war-horse. BSY is possibly the only leader in the pantheon of leaders around, who can be seen to be a real grass-roots leader capable of rousing the troops into action. The pity however is that the troops are just being assembled, and some of his key confidantes still sit across the party lines in the BJP, waiting to be rejected a ticket to defect. This delay might prove to be just too costly.

The Brand Imagery of the KJP: Nascent and just forming. The party needs to assemble its troops together fast. The key communication piece it needs to address is the fact that many a voter will think voting for the KJP is a waste of a vote. The typical hurdle the best of independent candidates face in elections, where voters want to vote for you, but don’t as they want a winner and not a loser to be the beneficiary of their valuable vote, faces the KJP as well. This is a big communication task.

Over to the election campaign then. Let’s see who says what?

Twitter @harishbijoor